Put Your Blinders On When It Comes to Peer Review
Published by Matt January 23rd, 2008 in Entrepreneurship, Science and Tech
Somehow the concept of transparency made its way into both my lunch and dinner conversations yesterday. It’s a worn topic, really, usually focused on privacy concerns and reputation (for the individual) or business opportunity, competitive pressure, or again, reputation (for the enterprise).
At dinner, though, with a good friend, we briefly touched on what’s a rarely discussed downside to the transparency march: peer success comparison. Research indicates that happiness hinges to some extent on one’s evaluation of status relative to one’s friend group. Career guru Penelope Trunk moved from New York City to Madison, Wisconsin at least in part to earn what her neighbors earn. But I doubt one’s mental calculus finishes at the end of the block. It’s so easy now to stay on top of peers’ accomplishments, to know folks largely through virtual mechanisms but for the relationship to feel present, enough so to figure into one’s world view and introspective analysis.
Such broad-based comparisons are nothing new, of course. Another friend religiously reads the New York Times’ wedding announcements and gets a kick out of scanning pedigrees. Unusual maybe, but I’d argue, too, that the public fixation on celebrities’ daily lives is part voyeurism, part vicarious living, and part self-soothing in witnessing the foibles and faults of a glorified peer group.
What’s different about today’s peer success comparison is its targeted scope. Tools have emerged to pretty easily monitor, and even interact with, a wide swath of acquaintances. And it’s only getting easier - consider Big Sight, an online “people directory” which allows one to slice affiliated peers by industry, location, graduation year, etc. The major social networks offer similar, albeit less facile, functionality.
I bring up the above because I think it’s particularly impacting entrepreneurs, for whom immense strength of will and determination at sticking through the tough times is often critical for success. And I think it’s harder to stick it out at times when you’re left wondering why an acquaintance got funding or hit it big. A feeling of being left behind looms in the wake of constant acquaintance success news. And sometimes that leads to risk-averse behavior.
There’s a counterpoint, here, of course, that targeted success comparison breeds motivation. It’s a fine line to ride, though, between motivation to push harder on your current tack and motivation to switch gears altogether, and sometimes onto a much less passion-centered and exciting path (scribe’s bias shining through).
So stick it out. Celebrate transparency but don’t get lost in it.
__________
Photo credit: Radiohead Crowd, originally uploaded by Samuel Stroube
***New to punctuative? Consider subscribing to my RSS feed (subscribe here), or sign up for email updates in the box to the right.
del.icio.us | Digg it | reddit
Search

About
You are currently browsing the punctuative! by Matt Winn weblog archives.
Subscribe
Categories
- Blogging (3)
- Books (4)
- E-Commerce (7)
- Entrepreneurship (54)
- Foresight (1)
- Healthcare (17)
- Life (12)
- Media (31)
- Politics (1)
- Science and Tech (18)
- Uncategorized (1)
- VC (40)
- Word Play (2)
Want this badge? Design courtesy of Ashley Cecil
Transparency comes in a lot of forms, not all of which is wonderful. There’s room for many varieties of disclosure, with the right form being some parts transparent, some translucent, some opaque, and some some kind of weird liquid crystal that switches from opaque to transparent when the right voltage is applied.
As to “making what your peers make”, a big piece of that is deciding where you want to live and then living there instead of living somewhere else. If you live in a college town, and you can calibrate your career to live most years on a new graduate’s starting salary for the best job in town, you can learn a whole lot - enough so that 2 or 3 years out of 10 you can do some crazy commute to the far corners of the earth and bring in a lot of money.
Matt,
Part of this too, comes from false comparisons. People are hyped online, and portrayed inaccurately. People who sit on panels are less likely to be experts, and more likely to be friends of the conference organizer, or of some other panelist. People with blogs that seem powerful and influential may not really be that widely read, or that financially lucrative. False online presences only make the problem of comparison that much worse for us all.