Entrepreneurship, VC

Build Something "Big and Clear"

image There’s an old college admissions question that goes something like this: “Is it better for my kid to get a B in the advanced math class or an A in the standard track?” Well, it’s better to get an A in the advanced math class, the admissions officer will tell you.

Entrepreneurs, if they’re good, are experts at optimizing the allocation of scarce resources to hit goals. They don’t respond well to the above answer because it’s in some ways an irrational one. And yet, unfortunately, investors offer an analogous demand. An entrepreneur might ask, “Is it better for my business to have moderate potential with a very simple value proposition and execution path or have huge potential and require multiple lines of business with a complex growth pattern?”  The answer is that it’s better to have huge potential and a very simple value proposition and execution path. Something “big and clear.”

This is why not all businesses are a good fit for venture financing. One of a number of reasons. And of course, investors have a range of appetites for business model complexity just as we have a range of appetites for stage. (Our appetites for potential, unfortunately, range from large to empire status in order to meet return expectations across a portfolio of risky investments.)

If you have complex growth assumptions, consider the following:

  1. Investors will give you real credit for existing lines of business with proven value and potential; similarly, obvious opportunity (e.g. ability to layer advertising into content consumption) will lend credibility to projections. On the other hand, theoretical/in-process business lines without market validation will often be heavily discounted. If you’re reliant on such business lines to arrive at large potential, do everything in your bootstrapped power to validate the market opportunity (make calls, cull research, pre-sell, etc).
  2. Investors value focus because its relentless pursuit tends to yield positive results. Question whether there are ways to focus your business model and simplify.
  3. Don’t be tempted to outline in depth the 15 untrod, optional paths to success, each utilizing a different model. While business model evolution is a key part of successful entrepreneurship, it takes an exceptionally reasoned entrepreneur to pull off this kind of a pitch and an exceptionally patient investor. Evidence the capacity to adapt and you will have made the appropriate point. If the objective is to indicate opportunity, point out the most attractive avenues, indicate that others exist, and allow for questioning to suss out the details if there is interest.

There’s good news under the expectations header, and that’s that rising operating efficiencies in many businesses are allowing for slightly lower top-line (revenue) expectations. Ultimately, that means it’s easier to work under a simple value proposition and execution path. It’s still hard to build something big and clear.

__________

Photo credit: Untitled, originally uploaded by nealpage

***New to punctuative?  Consider subscribing to my RSS feed (subscribe here), or sign up for email updates in the box to the right.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    @Shafqat:

    Good ideas, I think you have a valid question! I've hesitated to base a business model solely around an advertising schematic for that reason: Is the bubble about to burst (or more long-term: Will the bubble ever burst?). It seems to be an issue mostly regarding the internet and Web 2.0 industry because it seems that people are now not only used to how the internet operates but they know precisely what to expect.

    Example: When I browse a site, my eyes barely even notice the Google Ads, banners, and other clickable advertisements. Don't even get me started on pop-ups--I began my vendetta against them at the ripe old age of 14 (yes, I'm only 20 now!)

    The point is, Matt has a great point when he states "entrepreneurs will continue to innovate around monetization." We (entrepreneurs) are charged with innovating every monetization opportunity to not only squeeze every drop out of tried-and-true profit method, but to create new ones. Online advertising falls under both these umbrellas.

    The biggest issue for me when I'm reviewing/preparing a business plan or model is not the question of whether or not to include a plan for advertising online or elsewhere, but whether or not to base my bottom-line strategy on it. As an entrepreneur, I sometimes feel slightly defeated when I realize that my great idea must sit shotgun to an advertising campaign. It's not my call to judge the validity of these claims, but something about starting a business based on advertising or advertising alone just doesn't sit well with me!
    • ^
    • v
    Thanks, Shafqat. You're getting at something that I think has a lot of folks concerned - investors, entrepreneurs, and even established media companies. Is advertising as a business model over? Definitely not. It's become the defining monetization mechanism for content on the Internet. Are VCs a little shy around pure advertising models? Some are. Investors saw the advertising spigot dry in 2001/2002 and they're afraid it'll happen again. Forget the short-term outlook on recession; VCs will take the long view since it's usually the only route to building the kind of value we need in order to drive the kinds of returns that make fund economics hunt. The long view indicates that there will likely be a business cycle dip over an investment horizon and advertising may be a scary place to hang your hat during that time. You'll hear some counter that measurable, ROI-based advertising would be the last to go. I think there's some validity there. I also think entrepreneurs will continue to innovate around monetization. "Attention" always has value; one must examine HOW MUCH value in a given scenario. In order to justify a venture investment, a VC might have to believe you can drive LOTS of attention to weather the downturn. Plenty of investments are being made under that assumption today.

    Best,
    Matt
    • ^
    • v
    Great post, and it raises a few interesting questions that we've been trying to answer at our startup. You mention 'obvious opportunity' when it comes to business models. I couldn't agree more. Targeted or contextual advertising is one such tried and tested model, but there's a general feeling that more and more VCs are looking for more than just the standard advertising based business model, despite the fact that it has had tremendous success. I understand that you can't just stick ads anywhere (see Facebook's notoriously low click through rates), but are we coming to the end of the road when it comes to advertising as a biz model? Is the bubble about to burst? Clearly its not a simple answer, but just thought it'd be interesting to hear your thoughts...

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus