<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Commercial Ratings Step Closer to Net Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nita Van De Mark</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-40001</link>
		<dc:creator>Nita Van De Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-40001</guid>
		<description>Just a comment; the Jeep ad with the wolf, birds and chipmunk(?) is sooo refreshing.  I usually mute all commercials but not this one.  "Ain't it good, ain't it right...BABY BABY"!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a comment; the Jeep ad with the wolf, birds and chipmunk(?) is sooo refreshing.  I usually mute all commercials but not this one.  &#8220;Ain&#8217;t it good, ain&#8217;t it right&#8230;BABY BABY&#8221;!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raw-styles.com</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8864</link>
		<dc:creator>raw-styles.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8864</guid>
		<description>Sounds good in theory but they are two different animals. Most people are turned off by television ads, they tune them out, lower the volume, leave the room etc. Internet ads are different people actually look to them for info, if the two ever merged it could mean the death of one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good in theory but they are two different animals. Most people are turned off by television ads, they tune them out, lower the volume, leave the room etc. Internet ads are different people actually look to them for info, if the two ever merged it could mean the death of one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8162</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8162</guid>
		<description>Chris, agree re win/win but it's sure going to ruffle some feathers in the process!

Loren, love your point re youtube views as proxy for quality; it's real-time feedback which is what advertisers will eventually demand.  And, yes, in the midst of advertising "clutter" and DVR, ads have to be content unto themselves.

If I'm understanding things appropriately, we're going to see ratings re commercial "pods" come out first.  In other words, advertisers will know only how popular an entire slot of commercials was, not how their individual commercial fared.  Again, it's early days.

Best,
Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, agree re win/win but it&#8217;s sure going to ruffle some feathers in the process!</p>
<p>Loren, love your point re youtube views as proxy for quality; it&#8217;s real-time feedback which is what advertisers will eventually demand.  And, yes, in the midst of advertising &#8220;clutter&#8221; and DVR, ads have to be content unto themselves.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m understanding things appropriately, we&#8217;re going to see ratings re commercial &#8220;pods&#8221; come out first.  In other words, advertisers will know only how popular an entire slot of commercials was, not how their individual commercial fared.  Again, it&#8217;s early days.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8140</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8140</guid>
		<description>How about using the number of youtube views as a proxy for ad quality?

This is an interesting discussion as most of the "bleeding-edge" discussions around advertising seem to be focused on product-placement ads, embedded ads, in-game ads (for video games) since DVR's have turned a captive audience into an active audience.  By rating and building a competitive industry around TV advertising, one can engage an active audience and this advertising content could become part of the entertainment of television itself.  This in turn would arguably bring us full circle back to the product-placement advertising discussion where ads and entertainment become seamlessly merged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about using the number of youtube views as a proxy for ad quality?</p>
<p>This is an interesting discussion as most of the &#8220;bleeding-edge&#8221; discussions around advertising seem to be focused on product-placement ads, embedded ads, in-game ads (for video games) since DVR&#8217;s have turned a captive audience into an active audience.  By rating and building a competitive industry around TV advertising, one can engage an active audience and this advertising content could become part of the entertainment of television itself.  This in turn would arguably bring us full circle back to the product-placement advertising discussion where ads and entertainment become seamlessly merged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris sivori</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8114</link>
		<dc:creator>chris sivori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/04/17/tv-commercial-ratings-step-closer-to-net-transparency/#comment-8114</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Good point about advertisers not wanting to follow bad ads. In the end, all of this will be a win/win. Advertisers will get more transparency and premium venues will be able to prove their value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Good point about advertisers not wanting to follow bad ads. In the end, all of this will be a win/win. Advertisers will get more transparency and premium venues will be able to prove their value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
