<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never &#34;Just the Facts&#34;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punctuative.com/2007/02/15/never-just-the-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/02/15/never-just-the-facts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/02/15/never-just-the-facts/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/02/15/never-just-the-facts/#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>Brian:

Great insight re universal international affairs structuring.  It would seem military might plays a lesser role in future as "lone wolves" or "nodes" become an increasing threat.  I'd argue for a focus on information services, morality, and diplomacy.

Best,
Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:</p>
<p>Great insight re universal international affairs structuring.  It would seem military might plays a lesser role in future as &#8220;lone wolves&#8221; or &#8220;nodes&#8221; become an increasing threat.  I&#8217;d argue for a focus on information services, morality, and diplomacy.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://punctuative.com/2007/02/15/never-just-the-facts/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punctuative.com/2007/02/15/never-just-the-facts/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Heard O'Sullivan on radio.  Interesting was his description of how we won the cold war:  (1) militarily with Reagan's arms build up, (2) politically with Thatcher holding Europe united, and (3) the Pope morally undermining communism's iron fisted social policies. 

Funny b/c that same strategy is how we should be winning the war on terrorism: (1) militarily (check), (2) politically (we have too much opposition, both in Europe and at home, where dissent hurts us the most, b/c it helps rule out help from other nations), and (3) morally (Imans from around the world should be on tv every night describing how al Queda &#38; team are not true Muslims... where are they?).  IMHO, this is what it will take to win the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard O&#8217;Sullivan on radio.  Interesting was his description of how we won the cold war:  (1) militarily with Reagan&#8217;s arms build up, (2) politically with Thatcher holding Europe united, and (3) the Pope morally undermining communism&#8217;s iron fisted social policies. </p>
<p>Funny b/c that same strategy is how we should be winning the war on terrorism: (1) militarily (check), (2) politically (we have too much opposition, both in Europe and at home, where dissent hurts us the most, b/c it helps rule out help from other nations), and (3) morally (Imans from around the world should be on tv every night describing how al Queda &amp; team are not true Muslims&#8230; where are they?).  IMHO, this is what it will take to win the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
